Recently, I conducted an exploratory study on library websites search boxes (5 Oct 2016). I wanted to know the types of search boxes deployed by libraries that are using Summon as their web scale discovery layer. I googled and discovered around 83 Summon-ed libraries from Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, UAE, United Kingdom, and the United States of America.
Here are the various types of search boxes:
There are several distinctive types:
I noted that the libraries tend to go with simple search boxes or the multi-tabbed search boxes. Out of the 83 chosen sites, 35 (42%) deployed simple search boxes while 39 (47%) deployed multi-tabbed search boxes.
I was curious whether simple or multi-tabbed would be a better choice to deploy on a library website. In this Google-era, most searchers would just enter their search phrases or keywords into the search boxes. They expect to get relevant results at the top of the list. (Bear in mind that we have a multitude of users out there: the experts, the intermediates and the novices).
Results are often determined by some of these factors (not exhaustive):
Coming back to the library websites, I did some sample known item searches (for example: exact title of an electronic journal) on random library websites and noted that:
Our library is ‘moving’ all our electronic resources from the classic catalog and tap into the AZ portal as the resource base. We are hoping that Summon and AZ are capable to ‘talk’ to each other. And we are implementing a feature in AZ so that these e-resources can be easily searched and located in Summon. I’m hoping that this work. Otherwise, I may have to re-think on other alternatives. Stay tune.