The Vital Role of Library Student Assistants: A Professional Perspective

Have you ever wondered about the unsung heroes of our libraries? Those enthusiastic souls who eagerly help our users, organise shelves, and keep our spaces running smoothly? Yes, you guessed it right – the incredible student assistants! 📚🌟

In this blog post, I’m diving into the world of student assistants and their invaluable contributions to our libraries. Get ready to discover the magic they bring to our daily operations.

The Heartbeat of Our Libraries

Picture yourself in a bustling library, where books are constantly checked in, users are curious and seeking answers, and shelves are continually organised to maintain order. Our student assistants provide their invaluable expertise and enthusiasm, going above and beyond to assist patrons in preserving the liveliness of the library atmosphere and ensuring that our libraries continue to flourish.

Why Student Assistants Matter

It’s not just about shelving books or staffing the front desk. Student assistants infuse fresh perspectives, creativity, and a deep connection with the student body. They bridge the gap between staff and patrons, making our library a welcoming hub for learning and exploration. They are our eyes and ears – providing helpful feedback.  

Unveiling the Insights

Curious about what the research says? Here’s a curated list of articles that delve into the significance of student assistants in libraries:

  1. Mestre, L. S., & LeCrone, J. M. (2015). Elevating the Student Assistant: An Integrated Development Program for Student Library Assistants. College & Undergraduate Libraries22(1), 1–20.
  2. Benjamin, M., & McDevitt, T. (2018). The Benefits and Challenges of Working in an Academic Library: A Study of Student Library Assistant Experience. The Journal of Academic Librarianship44(2), 256–262.
  3. Folk, A. L. (2014). How Well Are We Preparing Them?: An Assessment of First-Year Library Student Assistants’ Information Literacy Skills. College & Undergraduate Libraries21(2), 177–192.
  4. STANFIELD, A. G., & PALMER, R. L. (2010). Peer-ing into the information commons: Making the most of student assistants in new library spaces (M. Bowler, Ed.; Vol. 38, pp. 634–646). Emerald.
  5. Keyes, K., & Dworak, E. (2017). Staffing Chat Reference with Undergraduate Student Assistants at an Academic Library: A Standards-Based Assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship43(6), 469–478.
  6. Rex, J. A., & Whelan, J. L. A. (2019). The undergraduate that could: Crafting a collaborative student training program. College & Undergraduate Libraries26(1), 19–34.
  7. Becker-Redd, K., Lee, K., & Skelton, C. (2018). Training Student Workers for Cross-Departmental Success in an Academic Library: A New Model. Journal of Library Administration58(2), 153–165.
  8. Vassady, L., Archer, A., & Ackermann, E. (2015). READ-ing Our Way to Success: Using the READ Scale to Successfully Train Reference Student Assistants in the Referral Model. Journal of Library Administration55(7), 535–548.
  9. Brenza, A., Kowalsky, M., & Brush, D. (2015). Perceptions of students working as library reference assistants at a University Library. Reference Services Review43(4), 722–736.
  10. Hupe, M., & Van Keuren, L. (2020). Tracking student assistants’ work at Dahlgren Memorial Library: The tools you’ll need. Journal of Access Services17(4), 165–175.
  11. Chan, K. P., Colvin, J. B., Vinyard, M., Leach, C., Naumann, M. A., & Stenis, P. (2015). Libraries Across the Sea: Using a Virtual Presence and Skilled Student Assistants to Serve Students Abroad. Journal of Library Administration55(4), 278–301.
  12. Goss, H., & Decker, E. N. (2022). Replacing staff with students to monitor LibChat service: transition process and lessons learned. Reference Services Review50(3/4), 419–431.
  13. Altman, S. (2017). Truly Getting to Know the Students: Benefits of Being a Library Assistant While Studying for an MLIS Degree. Knowledge Quest45(5), 8.
  14. DeZouche, E., & Santos, D. (2023). Shifting to a high impact practice-centered student worker staffed research desk: a Hispanic serving institution perspective. Reference Services Review51(2), 218–229.
  15. Gonnerman, K., & Johnson, K. (2016). Peer reference assistants in a small liberal arts college: case study. Reference Services Review44(3), 292–308.

My Take

I’ve had the privilege to work with some fantastic student assistants who have left an indelible mark on our library. Their dedication, fresh ideas, and willingness to learn have enriched our team in ways I couldn’t have imagined.

  • Nurturing Learning Beyond Books

Student assistants are more than just helping hands; they are catalysts for enhancing the overall library experience. Engaging with patrons, answering queries, and assisting in research endeavours, they bridge the gap between library resources and students’ needs. This engagement isn’t just transactional; it’s a genuine connection that fosters a sense of belonging within our library community.

  • Empowerment through Responsibility

One of the remarkable aspects of having student assistants is the empowerment it brings them. As they take charge of various responsibilities, from organising collections to aiding in technology support, they acquire skills beyond the library’s walls. These experiences sow the seeds of leadership, commitment, and collaboration, setting them on a path of professional growth.

  • Fresh Perspectives and Innovation

Student assistants infuse our libraries with a dose of fresh perspectives and innovation. Their proximity to the student body allows them to bring insights that might go unnoticed. By tapping into their ideas, we create a relevant and exciting space for our patrons. This collaboration between seasoned professionals and budding talents enriches our libraries in ways that traditional approaches might miss.

  • Building a Community

A library isn’t just a repository of books; it’s a community of learners and seekers. Student assistants contribute significantly to this sense of community. Through their interactions, they create an environment where patrons feel comfortable seeking assistance, engaging in discussions, and exploring new horizons. This nurturing atmosphere would be the same with their genuine enthusiasm.

  • A Call to Recognition

In this era of rapid technological advancement, it’s easy to overlook the profound impact of human interaction. Student assistants remind us that, at the core, our libraries are spaces for people – spaces where connections are forged and lives are transformed. Their dedication, diligence, and commitment deserve recognition and appreciation.

Let’s Celebrate Them

So, the next time you walk past a student assistant shelving books or assisting a user, remember the immense value they bring to our libraries. Let’s celebrate these budding library professionals who are our helpers and partners in creating a vibrant and dynamic library experience.

Keep rocking.

Legal Battles Between Authors and OpenAI Shed Light on Copyright and the Role of LLMs in Academic Research

In a recent article ( Academic Journals v. OpenAI? – Choice 360 ), three authors – Sarah Silverman, Mona Awad, and Paul Tremblay – have filed lawsuits against OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, alleging copyright infringement. The authors claim that ChatGPT generated detailed summaries of their books, suggesting it had absorbed the text of their works without proper authorization or compensation. These lawsuits raise questions about the ethical and legal boundaries of AI’s interaction with copyrighted content and the black-box nature of Large Language Models (LLMs).

This legal battle also highlights potential future conflicts involving academic journals and LLMs. There is speculation that academic journals might consider legal action against AI companies for copyright infringement. As some journals restrict access to their copyrighted content, the question arises: Can LLMs recreate copyrighted information using alternative sources, such as news reports, abstracts, and citations from the open-access scholarship?

The outcomes of the ongoing lawsuits involving the authors and OpenAI could influence academic journals and publishing companies to take legal action if they find evidence of copyright infringement.

Personal Opinion: The lawsuits brought against OpenAI by authors Sarah Silverman, Mona Awad, and Paul Tremblay raise crucial questions about copyright infringement in the context of AI-generated content. The concern over LLMs like ChatGPT potentially absorbing copyrighted material without proper authorization is valid and warrants legal examination. These cases underscore the importance of transparency in AI development, ensuring that AI models are trained on legally obtained and appropriately credited data.

The speculation surrounding potential lawsuits by academic journals against AI companies also highlights the broader challenges LLMs pose in scholarly publishing. As discussions around open access and copyright intensify, AI developers and academic institutions must collaborate to establish ethical guidelines for using AI-generated content in academic research.

Furthermore, the article rightly points out the limitations of LLMs as research tools. While they can provide a starting point for research, scholars and librarians must remain cautious about relying solely on AI-generated content. The potential biases and gaps in training data must be acknowledged, and users should continue to evaluate and curate information from diverse sources critically.

Ultimately, the evolving landscape of generative AI requires a comprehensive approach that considers legal, ethical, and scholarly dimensions. As AI continues to shape research and scholarship, educators should actively engage students in discussions about the benefits and limitations of AI tools, encouraging them to view AI-generated content as a valuable supplement rather than a definitive source.

#LLMs #AcademicResearch #EthicalAI #AIandCopyright #OpenAI #LegalChallenges #ResearchTools #BiasInAI #AcademicJournals #ScholarshipEthics #ResearchEthics #FutureOfAI #FairUse #

Evaluating ChatGPT’s Effectiveness in Answering Library Reference Questions

Article: How Well Can ChatGPT Answer Library Reference Questions? – Choice 360

Authors: Sandy Hervieux and Amanda Wheatley are academic librarians with expertise in information literacy, artificial intelligence, and user services. Sandy is the Head of the Nahum Gelber Law Library at McGill University, and Amanda is an Associate Librarian at the same institution. Their research interests revolve around reference services, user experience, and the impact of AI on library services. 

#ChatGPT #LibraryReference #InformationLiteracy #AIinLibraries #Librarians #AcademicLibrarians #ResearchInterest

Summary

The rise of ChatGPT has sparked discussions among librarians regarding its potential impact on information validity, user evaluation, and the future of reference services. Two academic librarians decided to put ChatGPT to the test by asking it four reference questions based on their own virtual reference service. The goal was to assess its ability to provide accurate and helpful information.

Reference Question 1 – Dataset on Church Attendance Rates in the US (1950-2000): ChatGPT offered some valuable starting points for finding the dataset but lacked clarity on the curated datasets and where to find them. Additionally, it suggested sources like the National Center for Health Statistics, which needed to be more relevant. While it encouraged users to evaluate credibility, consulting a librarian for further assistance should have been recommended. ChatGPT provided some direction, but undergraduate students may require more guidance on this complex topic. 

Reference Question 2 – Obituary of Ruth Bader Ginsburg: ChatGPT demonstrated its limitations by lacking real-time internet access and providing only suggestions for finding the obituary. A librarian would be better suited to give an exact answer, but ChatGPT’s suggestions were reasonable. 

Reference Question 3 – Scientific Articles and Consumer Reports in the Travel Industry: ChatGPT recommended various databases but overlooked sources specifically for industry reports. It also mentioned TripAdvisor, which does not contain industry information. The guidance needed more details on searching for peer-reviewed journals and evaluating sources. 

Reference Question 4 – Primary Source on the Fall of the Berlin Wall: ChatGPT provided a valuable recommendation for a fictional primary source, showcasing its predictive nature. When asked about the book’s authors, it clarified its limitations and provided alternative primary sources. This interaction highlights the importance of teaching users to use ChatGPT effectively and continue critically evaluating sources. 

Conclusion: ChatGPT offers some assistance in answering reference questions, but its limitations, such as no real-time internet access and predictive responses, call for cautious usage. Librarians remain crucial in guiding users, offering specialized research skills, and ensuring information credibility. As librarians navigate the integration of AI, collaboration with AI tools can enhance the user experience. Still, human expertise remains essential for reliable and accurate information access. 

Design Thinking For Libraries

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

This month, we present Design Thinking for Libraries, a project used by libraries worldwide to redesign their service whilst focusing on the users’ needs. We have talked with Sidsel Bech-Petersen, Head of Innovation and User Involvement at Aarhus Public Libraries, who tells us more about the concept and how libraries can benefit from using it.

Source: Design Thinking For Libraries

You’re an amazing librarian! Does your profile say so?

Source: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/you-re-amazing-librarian-does-your-profile-say-so?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+libraryconnect+%28Elsevier+Library+Connect+%7C+Articles%29

“Librarians are doing amazing things as interdisciplinary facilitators, knowledge creators, systems specialists, teachers, and researchers; however, this expertise is not always reflected online. Full online profiles are an effective way to embed yourself in the academic life of your institution and increase opportunities for collaboration with faculty and staff in many disciplines.”

Excerpt from website.

8 tips for getting it done when working from home

“With many businesses considering how best to keep teams connected when not everyone can be in the same location, we’ve been asked by a number of our customers for recommendations for staying productive and on task. Here are some best practices for fostering collaboration when your teams find themselves working remotely.” (Excerpt from Blogpost).

https://blog.google/products/g-suite/8-tips-for-working-from-home/